<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: February 23 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: April 4 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April 4 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9310#comment-44179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Hilden on First Circuit &#8220;true statements can be defamatory&#8221; ruling [FindLaw, earlier here and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hilden on First Circuit &#8220;true statements can be defamatory&#8221; ruling [FindLaw, earlier here and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: March 21 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[March 21 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9310#comment-43240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Coalition of media organizations urges First Circuit to reverse judge&#8217;s &#8220;truth-no-defense&#8221; defamation ruling, but the Circuit denies en banc rehearing [Bayard/Citizen Media Law and sequel; earlier] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Coalition of media organizations urges First Circuit to reverse judge&#8217;s &#8220;truth-no-defense&#8221; defamation ruling, but the Circuit denies en banc rehearing [Bayard/Citizen Media Law and sequel; earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-40951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9310#comment-40951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No. VARA rights attach to unique works of art, not en masse reproductions. Otherwise there might be a cause of action against someone who discards a coffee table book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. VARA rights attach to unique works of art, not en masse reproductions. Otherwise there might be a cause of action against someone who discards a coffee table book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cousin Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-40950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cousin Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9310#comment-40950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In regard to CPSIA and books, I wonder: do the authors of those books have rights under the Visual Artists Rights Act?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to CPSIA and books, I wonder: do the authors of those books have rights under the Visual Artists Rights Act?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Todd Rogers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-23-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-40933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9310#comment-40933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps &lt;strike&gt;The Rev.&lt;/strike&gt; A.G. Holder wants to &quot;egg on&quot; open race-related dialog in the workplace as a way of pouring some fuel on the litigation fire...his chums would surely love as much opportune discussions as their case-loads will allow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps <strike>The Rev.</strike> A.G. Holder wants to &#8220;egg on&#8221; open race-related dialog in the workplace as a way of pouring some fuel on the litigation fire&#8230;his chums would surely love as much opportune discussions as their case-loads will allow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
