<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kenneth Ross on CPSIA stay	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/kenneth-ross-on-cpsia-stay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/kenneth-ross-on-cpsia-stay/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Donna Maria @ Indie Business		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/kenneth-ross-on-cpsia-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-39650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna Maria @ Indie Business]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8710#comment-39650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What Congress needs to do is recognize that a grave injustice has occurred and simply take the law back to the drawing board. Tiny companies should not be regulated under this law in the same manner that huge companies are regulated under this law. That&#039;s simple and it&#039;s also obvious. If tiny companies had knows about this law when it was first proposed as a bill, it would still be a bill. Now that the problems have been clearly articulated where tiny companies are concerned, it needs to be a bill again. Yes, that&#039;s unheard of. And yes, it would be a difficult thing do to. But this is going to be difficult no matter what. Send it back. It&#039;s the right and most sensible thing to do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Congress needs to do is recognize that a grave injustice has occurred and simply take the law back to the drawing board. Tiny companies should not be regulated under this law in the same manner that huge companies are regulated under this law. That&#8217;s simple and it&#8217;s also obvious. If tiny companies had knows about this law when it was first proposed as a bill, it would still be a bill. Now that the problems have been clearly articulated where tiny companies are concerned, it needs to be a bill again. Yes, that&#8217;s unheard of. And yes, it would be a difficult thing do to. But this is going to be difficult no matter what. Send it back. It&#8217;s the right and most sensible thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/kenneth-ross-on-cpsia-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-39614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8710#comment-39614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the CPSC issues a stay on enforcement, and a court later finds that the agency had no legal right to issue this stay, does that mean that manufacturers and retailers who didn&#039;t test because of the stay would now be at risk of being charged for ignoring the Feb. 10 deadline? Does the CPSC&#039;s stay provide these manufacturers and retailers with any legal defense if the stay itself is later found to be unlawful?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the CPSC issues a stay on enforcement, and a court later finds that the agency had no legal right to issue this stay, does that mean that manufacturers and retailers who didn&#8217;t test because of the stay would now be at risk of being charged for ignoring the Feb. 10 deadline? Does the CPSC&#8217;s stay provide these manufacturers and retailers with any legal defense if the stay itself is later found to be unlawful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
