Comments on: NRDC’s non-compliant onesie

By: CPSIA chronicles, February 19

CPSIA chronicles, February 19 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:21:38 +0000

[…] already visited the question whether one big organization that has vociferously defended CPSIA, the Natural […]

By: Connie

Connie — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:43:38 +0000

We know, K, we know. I will watch their website to see how many days before that ***sie is taken off their website.

By: K

Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:31:51 +0000

I’m going to have to remember to post my findings before I twitter or DM them because I get no glory lol. I just get so carried away with excitement.

Note: Gerber has been informed of NRDC’s transgression officially. ~whistling~

By: Melvin H.

Melvin H. — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:45:11 +0000

What am I missing here–the CPSIA itself, it seems to me, is the civil equivalent of a person who, driving 70 mph in a 75 zone one day, gets ticketed for speeding because the speed limit in that zone is now 55 mph . . . and gets fined $5000 per mile over the limit for every day it happened.
In other words, couldn’t someone haul this screwed-up law up before a judge as ex post facto under the U.S. Constitution, in order to repeal or stop this from taking effect?

By: Darby

Darby — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:40:02 +0000

You think the NY Times will do a story on that? Right.