<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: March 17 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-17-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-17-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-17-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-42896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9812#comment-42896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;thinks it’s sin forbidden in Book of Leviticus&quot; 

Is there really a need to be reflexively anti-religious and make up details to a story?  According to the story you link (and the story it links), she was apparently just clueless as to what &quot;husbandry&quot; meant -- religion had nothing to do with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;thinks it’s sin forbidden in Book of Leviticus&#8221; </p>
<p>Is there really a need to be reflexively anti-religious and make up details to a story?  According to the story you link (and the story it links), she was apparently just clueless as to what &#8220;husbandry&#8221; meant &#8212; religion had nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
