<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: March 25 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-25-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-25-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DM		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-25-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10022#comment-43575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;wonders when we can look forward to the Meg Ryan film “You’ve Got Blog Comments&lt;/i&gt;

Heh heh. I married a blogger&#039;s son who I met through commenting on his (the blogger&#039;s) blog. Obviously material for a romantic comedy. Okay, maybe not. :-)

(Hi, I&#039;m a regular reader, even though I never comment. LOVE this blog!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>wonders when we can look forward to the Meg Ryan film “You’ve Got Blog Comments</i></p>
<p>Heh heh. I married a blogger&#8217;s son who I met through commenting on his (the blogger&#8217;s) blog. Obviously material for a romantic comedy. Okay, maybe not. 🙂</p>
<p>(Hi, I&#8217;m a regular reader, even though I never comment. LOVE this blog!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PhilG		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-25-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhilG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10022#comment-43565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the case of that woman who killed a man while driving high on narcotic painkillers, you will note that the lawyer sued all seven pharmacies that had ever filled prescriptions for her, not just the pharmacy that supplied the particular pills that she had taken that day.  Had he just sued the one pharmacy, that would have been an example of suing a deep-pocketed bystander.  But he must have decided that seven  deep pocketed bystanders is seven times more lucrative for him than one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of that woman who killed a man while driving high on narcotic painkillers, you will note that the lawyer sued all seven pharmacies that had ever filled prescriptions for her, not just the pharmacy that supplied the particular pills that she had taken that day.  Had he just sued the one pharmacy, that would have been an example of suing a deep-pocketed bystander.  But he must have decided that seven  deep pocketed bystanders is seven times more lucrative for him than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
