<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Possible Solutions To Improve the CPSIA&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/possible-solutions-to-improve-the-cpsia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/possible-solutions-to-improve-the-cpsia/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Linda Moore Kurth		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/possible-solutions-to-improve-the-cpsia/comment-page-1/#comment-43705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda Moore Kurth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10006#comment-43705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brilliant suggestion.  Start over!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant suggestion.  Start over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GR		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/possible-solutions-to-improve-the-cpsia/comment-page-1/#comment-43564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10006#comment-43564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And what about the issue that 12 year olds are included in a purported solution for a problem that affects pre-schoolers?

And what about the incredibly stringent exemption requirements?  The law as written is designed to make such exemptions virtually impossible to obtain, especially with the minimal staffing that Congress (not Nancy Nord, Congress) has yet to fund for expansion.

Start over.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about the issue that 12 year olds are included in a purported solution for a problem that affects pre-schoolers?</p>
<p>And what about the incredibly stringent exemption requirements?  The law as written is designed to make such exemptions virtually impossible to obtain, especially with the minimal staffing that Congress (not Nancy Nord, Congress) has yet to fund for expansion.</p>
<p>Start over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carol Baicker-McKee		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/03/possible-solutions-to-improve-the-cpsia/comment-page-1/#comment-43522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Baicker-McKee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10006#comment-43522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many of these are sound suggestions, especially the ones about harmonization with the EU standards and eliminating retroactivity, but I still think the best strategy is to repeal this law and start again. As Learning Resources Inc has noted, the paperwork for component testing would be a nightmare for any complex product (they break down the components of a relatively simple educational cash register - it&#039;s staggering.) Another problem is that the CPSC&#039;s exemptions and rulings are not and will not be binding on the 50 states&#039; attorneys general, so no one conducting interstate commerce will be able to rest easy.

There are interesting new articles in the Washington Post Health section: (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032301764.html) and in the Tampa Bay/St. Petersburg paper: http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article985784.ece, both on books. Check out the comments for both - think they capture the sentiments of ordinary people when they learn about this law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of these are sound suggestions, especially the ones about harmonization with the EU standards and eliminating retroactivity, but I still think the best strategy is to repeal this law and start again. As Learning Resources Inc has noted, the paperwork for component testing would be a nightmare for any complex product (they break down the components of a relatively simple educational cash register &#8211; it&#8217;s staggering.) Another problem is that the CPSC&#8217;s exemptions and rulings are not and will not be binding on the 50 states&#8217; attorneys general, so no one conducting interstate commerce will be able to rest easy.</p>
<p>There are interesting new articles in the Washington Post Health section: (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032301764.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032301764.html</a>) and in the Tampa Bay/St. Petersburg paper: <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article985784.ece" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article985784.ece</a>, both on books. Check out the comments for both &#8211; think they capture the sentiments of ordinary people when they learn about this law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
