<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: May 7 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-7-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-7-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Member of Congress defends speech-ban bill		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-7-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-48045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Member of Congress defends speech-ban bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10999#comment-48045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Although the proposed Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act would criminalize a wide range of online speech that leads to emotional distress, Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) says we should rest assured that judges in their discretion will apply it only to nasties who are bothering our children &#8212; except that the bill is in no way limited to that type of speech. Eugene Volokh dissects (earlier here and here). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Although the proposed Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act would criminalize a wide range of online speech that leads to emotional distress, Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) says we should rest assured that judges in their discretion will apply it only to nasties who are bothering our children &#8212; except that the bill is in no way limited to that type of speech. Eugene Volokh dissects (earlier here and here). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mojo		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-7-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-48024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mojo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10999#comment-48024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1-800-LAWYERS

Bushwa, Bounder and Sleeze, LLC?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1-800-LAWYERS</p>
<p>Bushwa, Bounder and Sleeze, LLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Todd Rogers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-7-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-48021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10999#comment-48021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Throw bloggers in prison because their posts cause emotional distress? &lt;/i&gt;  Vonnegut&#039;s Bergeron wasn&#039;t so far fetched, after all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Throw bloggers in prison because their posts cause emotional distress? </i>  Vonnegut&#8217;s Bergeron wasn&#8217;t so far fetched, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
