Comments on: Real estate “nondisclosure of tragedy” claims https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/real-estate-nondisclosure-of-tragedy-claims/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 28 May 2009 11:12:26 +0000 hourly 1 By: William Nuesslein https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/real-estate-nondisclosure-of-tragedy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-49350 Thu, 28 May 2009 11:12:26 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=11385#comment-49350 Thank God it was only blood and brains under the rug. It could have been lead paint!

]]> By: A.W. https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/real-estate-nondisclosure-of-tragedy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-49290 Wed, 27 May 2009 18:45:45 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=11385#comment-49290 Don’t have time to read about that case, but i am reminded of the amity horror case, where the owners of that house sold it to people who had no idea it was THAT house. The classic line in the opinion was when they said that they had claimed it was haunted for so long in so many publications that they were estopped from claiming that it wasn’t haunted now. So, the court says, “as a matter of law, the house is haunted.”

Awesome.

]]>