<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: State attorneys general vs. Craigslist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/state-attorneys-general-vs-craigslist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/state-attorneys-general-vs-craigslist/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Craigslist vs. South Carolina AG		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/state-attorneys-general-vs-craigslist/comment-page-1/#comment-48710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craigslist vs. South Carolina AG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10969#comment-48710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Attorney General Henry McMaster. [Citizen Media Law, Jim Buckmaster/Craigslist blog] Earlier here and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Attorney General Henry McMaster. [Citizen Media Law, Jim Buckmaster/Craigslist blog] Earlier here and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/state-attorneys-general-vs-craigslist/comment-page-1/#comment-48691</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10969#comment-48691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Best thing that could happen for Craigslist as it is free publicity. 

No way the state could win that suit in view of esisting laws on the federal level which would most likely preempt any state challenge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best thing that could happen for Craigslist as it is free publicity. </p>
<p>No way the state could win that suit in view of esisting laws on the federal level which would most likely preempt any state challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/state-attorneys-general-vs-craigslist/comment-page-1/#comment-47976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10969#comment-47976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m no legal expert, but is there any reason Craigslist can&#039;t tell South Carolina to go screw? It seems to me that a) they&#039;re covered under existing laws which prevent such sites from liability from things their users post and b) South Carolina courts lack jurisdiction over Craigslist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no legal expert, but is there any reason Craigslist can&#8217;t tell South Carolina to go screw? It seems to me that a) they&#8217;re covered under existing laws which prevent such sites from liability from things their users post and b) South Carolina courts lack jurisdiction over Craigslist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
