Comments on: “The pet door is a really serious hazard”

By: 4 Borders Pundit

4 Borders Pundit — Sat, 16 May 2009 11:27:51 +0000

Heh. The page coding is notably similar. Web page designers are sooo lazy! From petaccessdangers.org: <blockquote cite="Bookmark This Page Contact Us"> And from productsafetyattorneys.com: <blockquote cite="Bookmark This Page Contact Us">

By: “Can you afford your doggie door?”

“Can you afford your doggie door?” — Sat, 16 May 2009 11:11:25 +0000

[…] Dog Scoop, a followup on that “hazardous pet door” story we covered last week (with a hat tip to the skill of Overlawyered readers in, well, […]

By: Lucy

Lucy — Sat, 16 May 2009 05:16:59 +0000

According to the Tampa Bay Fox webstory, the “advocacy” website was just set up earlier this week.
http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/news/spring_hill_mom_launches_doggie_door_danger_website_051309

Convenient, huh?

Problem is that same website describes how the child went THROUGH the pool fence. Why is the pool fence manufacturer not being sued? Would it have anything to do with the fact that the PetSafe company is projected to be a billion dollar company by 2014?

http://www.volunteertv.com/news/headlines/22063974.html

By: Blogging Politics

Blogging Politics — Thu, 14 May 2009 01:54:24 +0000

[…] Update A: “The pet door is a really serious hazard!” […]

By: Todd Rogers

Todd Rogers — Thu, 14 May 2009 01:11:33 +0000

Disclaimer on the site’s “contact us” link:
Remember not to include any confidential information in your submission. The use of the Internet for communications with the firm will not establish an attorney-client relationship and messages containing confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent.

“the firm” huh?

By: Todd Rogers

Todd Rogers — Thu, 14 May 2009 01:06:33 +0000

Simple cash-grab. Go ask Mr. Rooney about the risks of doggy doors…Ferris.

By: Richard A Harrison

Richard A Harrison — Wed, 13 May 2009 23:11:52 +0000

CKG is correct – mom’s website is owned by . . . wait for it . . . the PI lawyers trolling for clients!

Excerpt from domain registry:

Domain ID:D155264523-LROR
Domain Name:PETACCESSDANGERS.ORG
Created On:04-Feb-2009 01:14:06 UTC
Last Updated On:12-May-2009 13:43:32 UTC
Expiration Date:04-Feb-2010 01:14:06 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:GODA-059056772
Registrant Name:JOSEPH DIDIER
Registrant Street1:2100 HAMPTON DR. N.
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:ST. PETERSBURG
Registrant State/Province:Florida

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 13 May 2009 21:00:44 +0000

That “PetAccessDangers.com” website is fascinating.

Her kid didn’t die in the pet door. He drowned in the pool. A good parent would have 1) had a fence around the pool 2) had a pool alarm 3) taught the child to swim and 4) not had a pool in a house with young children.

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Wed, 13 May 2009 20:47:00 +0000

They could pay a lawyer a lot of money. Isn’t that always the way it’s done?

Bob

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 13 May 2009 20:41:30 +0000

It’s a rectangular hole with a flap. What could they possibly do to make it “safer?”