<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wrongs without remedies dept.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/wrongs-without-remedies-dept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/wrongs-without-remedies-dept/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Wisniewski		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/05/wrongs-without-remedies-dept/comment-page-1/#comment-49538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Wisniewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11387#comment-49538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The justices said such an expansive remedy would chill a litigant&#039;s ability to pursue a plausibly meritorious claim. They said they preferred to leave it to the attorney-disciplinary system to safeguard against such abuses.&quot;

The &quot;attorney-disciplinary&quot; system exists in NJ in name only - it is the fox guarding the hen house.

As the Law.com doesn&#039;t say whether a R.1:4-8 motion was made for sanctions, it is difficult to tell under what authority the so-called SLAPP suit was brought.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The justices said such an expansive remedy would chill a litigant&#8217;s ability to pursue a plausibly meritorious claim. They said they preferred to leave it to the attorney-disciplinary system to safeguard against such abuses.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;attorney-disciplinary&#8221; system exists in NJ in name only &#8211; it is the fox guarding the hen house.</p>
<p>As the Law.com doesn&#8217;t say whether a R.1:4-8 motion was made for sanctions, it is difficult to tell under what authority the so-called SLAPP suit was brought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
