<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ex-wife wins $500K in suit against new wife	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dirk D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I should also point out that this is not a contract case,  it&#039;s a tort case. I was just responding to nevins comment on it being about breach of contract.

Does anyone know if these laws apply only to married couples?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out that this is not a contract case,  it&#8217;s a tort case. I was just responding to nevins comment on it being about breach of contract.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if these laws apply only to married couples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dirk D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Dirk, it sounds to me as if the value of the ‘breach of contract’ would be covered by property settlement and alimony. &quot;

That is correct and even if it wasn&#039;t, it wouldn&#039;t create a cause of action against a third party. I&#039;m a lawyer, but not a contract lawyer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dirk, it sounds to me as if the value of the ‘breach of contract’ would be covered by property settlement and alimony. &#8221;</p>
<p>That is correct and even if it wasn&#8217;t, it wouldn&#8217;t create a cause of action against a third party. I&#8217;m a lawyer, but not a contract lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Speaking as another non-lawyer, Dirk, it sounds to me as if the value of the &#039;breach of contract&#039;  would be covered by property settlement and alimony.  Would any lawyer care to comment on this?

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as another non-lawyer, Dirk, it sounds to me as if the value of the &#8216;breach of contract&#8217;  would be covered by property settlement and alimony.  Would any lawyer care to comment on this?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dirk D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’m no lawyer, but is there not some civil situations where a third party inducing others to breach a contract can be under some liability? 

Not really, at least not under general principles for contract law. There may be some random situations where this may happen but I&#039;m not aware of any.

When a contract is breached the damages are usually limited to the value of the contract and only the breaching party is liable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m no lawyer, but is there not some civil situations where a third party inducing others to breach a contract can be under some liability? </p>
<p>Not really, at least not under general principles for contract law. There may be some random situations where this may happen but I&#8217;m not aware of any.</p>
<p>When a contract is breached the damages are usually limited to the value of the contract and only the breaching party is liable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: damnum absque injuria &#187; Judicial Hellhole Hath No Fury Like A Tarheel Scorned		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damnum absque injuria &#187; Judicial Hellhole Hath No Fury Like A Tarheel Scorned]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] and Walter Olson link to the latest abuse of two wacky common law torts 42 states have had the good sense to abolish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and Walter Olson link to the latest abuse of two wacky common law torts 42 states have had the good sense to abolish [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nevins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nevins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is so unreasonable about alienation of affection?  I&#039;m no lawyer, but is there not some civil situations where a third party inducing others to breach a contract can be under some liability?  Marriage is a contract, whether it is defined like Heinlein would as a pure private contract (the pre-nup and nuptual contract rolled into one and binding, complete with severance clauses and the like)  or as a statutory matter defined by the state&#039;s legislature.  
Let the marriage contract sort it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is so unreasonable about alienation of affection?  I&#8217;m no lawyer, but is there not some civil situations where a third party inducing others to breach a contract can be under some liability?  Marriage is a contract, whether it is defined like Heinlein would as a pure private contract (the pre-nup and nuptual contract rolled into one and binding, complete with severance clauses and the like)  or as a statutory matter defined by the state&#8217;s legislature.<br />
Let the marriage contract sort it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: spudbeach		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/ex-wife-wins-500k-in-suit-against-new-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-51015</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudbeach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11784#comment-51015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am _sooo_ glad that I live in Wisconsin.  Not only are alienation of affection lawsuits not allowed, it is actually illegal to even threaten one!  Wisc. Stats. 768.03 makes it illegal to threaten, and 768.07 sets the penalty to $10,000 fine and/or 9 months in jail.

Now if they could get rid of the stupid statutory rape laws that make it illegal for 15 year olds to have sex with anybody . . .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am _sooo_ glad that I live in Wisconsin.  Not only are alienation of affection lawsuits not allowed, it is actually illegal to even threaten one!  Wisc. Stats. 768.03 makes it illegal to threaten, and 768.07 sets the penalty to $10,000 fine and/or 9 months in jail.</p>
<p>Now if they could get rid of the stupid statutory rape laws that make it illegal for 15 year olds to have sex with anybody . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
