<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Former employee wins $4.1 billion&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Connecticut Employment Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-51021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connecticut Employment Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-51021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Employee Awarded $4.1 Billion in Wrongful Termination/Breach of  Contract Arbitration (And No, That is Not a Typo)...&lt;/strong&gt;

In case you missed it, a California court recently upheld a $4.1 billion aribration award to a former executive who brought a wrongful termination suit against his former employer. (The National Law Journal has a good analysis today of what......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Employee Awarded $4.1 Billion in Wrongful Termination/Breach of  Contract Arbitration (And No, That is Not a Typo)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In case you missed it, a California court recently upheld a $4.1 billion aribration award to a former executive who brought a wrongful termination suit against his former employer. (The National Law Journal has a good analysis today of what&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-50771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-50771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m waiting for the trial lawyers to explain to us why arbitration is unfair to employees, and that this particular plaintiff was really entitled to twice as much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the trial lawyers to explain to us why arbitration is unfair to employees, and that this particular plaintiff was really entitled to twice as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-50724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-50724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would it fail to qualify?  I&#039;m just waiting for my award of  ten quadrillion dollars.  And then I&#039;m going to flap my arms and fly to the moon.

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would it fail to qualify?  I&#8217;m just waiting for my award of  ten quadrillion dollars.  And then I&#8217;m going to flap my arms and fly to the moon.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Commentor		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-50717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Commentor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-50717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Under the FAA, one way you can challenge a normally unassailable arbitration award is over miscalculations apparent on the face of the award.  Anybody think this might qualify?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the FAA, one way you can challenge a normally unassailable arbitration award is over miscalculations apparent on the face of the award.  Anybody think this might qualify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Soronel Haetir		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-50697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soronel Haetir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-50697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Talk about bet the company litigation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about bet the company litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jkoerner		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/former-employee-wins-41-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-50686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkoerner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11706#comment-50686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting. The defendants were unhelpful in discovery, so the base amount for the award came from a single month&#039;s sale figure of $535K with the understanding that sales had grown between 10% and 20% per month in 2005. The arbitrator then compounded it forward assuming 10% growth per month for 7 more years (until 2012). This is an amazing growth rate that has the arbitrator assuming approximately $1.9 billion in revenue a month in 2012 or $23 billion a year. For comparison, this is more than Oracle had in revenue last year. Of course, the actual damages were also trebled for punitive damages (for a breach of K?), but I guess that is Cali law.

Comparing this arbiter&#039;s calculations to practical economics, I have a feeling this is going to be a hard judgment to collect outside of fantasy land.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The defendants were unhelpful in discovery, so the base amount for the award came from a single month&#8217;s sale figure of $535K with the understanding that sales had grown between 10% and 20% per month in 2005. The arbitrator then compounded it forward assuming 10% growth per month for 7 more years (until 2012). This is an amazing growth rate that has the arbitrator assuming approximately $1.9 billion in revenue a month in 2012 or $23 billion a year. For comparison, this is more than Oracle had in revenue last year. Of course, the actual damages were also trebled for punitive damages (for a breach of K?), but I guess that is Cali law.</p>
<p>Comparing this arbiter&#8217;s calculations to practical economics, I have a feeling this is going to be a hard judgment to collect outside of fantasy land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
