<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Judge closes door on legal quirk in patent law&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/judge-closes-door-on-legal-quirk-in-patent-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/judge-closes-door-on-legal-quirk-in-patent-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Commentor		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/judge-closes-door-on-legal-quirk-in-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-54135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Commentor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12229#comment-54135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems as though it would be highly difficult to prove malicious intent, nobody looks at the circle p as determinative of whether a patent exists or is valid anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as though it would be highly difficult to prove malicious intent, nobody looks at the circle p as determinative of whether a patent exists or is valid anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/judge-closes-door-on-legal-quirk-in-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-54121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12229#comment-54121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I read the article. Did this judge really close the door on a legal quirk, or simply reject this one case.

You&#039;d wonder if this suit were against a company that wasn&#039;t as politically innocuous as a plastic cup maker--like a tobacco company--if the suit would have continued.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article. Did this judge really close the door on a legal quirk, or simply reject this one case.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d wonder if this suit were against a company that wasn&#8217;t as politically innocuous as a plastic cup maker&#8211;like a tobacco company&#8211;if the suit would have continued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
