<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Law firm&#8217;s typo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/law-firms-typo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/law-firms-typo/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/law-firms-typo/comment-page-1/#comment-57389</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12607#comment-57389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Am I wrong in thinking that the Parole Evidence Rule prevents the introduction of evidence as to the intended meaning of the contract?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I wrong in thinking that the Parole Evidence Rule prevents the introduction of evidence as to the intended meaning of the contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/law-firms-typo/comment-page-1/#comment-57194</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12607#comment-57194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While we all know that these greedy real-estate &quot;investors&quot; were so convinced that prices will only go UP UP UP that they never read the fine print....it sure seems significant to me, and they should be required to uphold the contract the way it appears.

An insignificant error would be more along the lines of a misspelling of a person&#039;s name, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we all know that these greedy real-estate &#8220;investors&#8221; were so convinced that prices will only go UP UP UP that they never read the fine print&#8230;.it sure seems significant to me, and they should be required to uphold the contract the way it appears.</p>
<p>An insignificant error would be more along the lines of a misspelling of a person&#8217;s name, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
