https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:34:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71980 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:34:18 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71980 And yet again the press doens’t know the difference between “hijab” and the scarf. I’m not Muslim; I do know something about different kinds of head coverings. The scarf is known as a “niqab”. The word “hijab” is the standard of modesty for Muslim women. Frankly I’m not sure it can even be used in the singular, as “a hijab”….

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71924 Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:59:02 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71924 @Jack Wilson Modus tollens will tell us the same thing that reading the news does: there *is* no limit to what the feds can do, and in fact are doing. The Constitution as a check on government power was lost some time ago and something like 90% of our current regulatory environment would have to be trashed to recover it.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71906 Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:49 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71906 How does the EEOC survive constitutional scrutiny? If the EEOC can exist, then there is no limit on what the feds can do.

]]>