<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: France to regulate Photoshopped pics?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/france-to-regulate-photoshopped-pics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/france-to-regulate-photoshopped-pics/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Moriarty		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/france-to-regulate-photoshopped-pics/comment-page-1/#comment-72155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moriarty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13902#comment-72155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr Olson, you&#039;ll be hearing from Adobe&#039;s lawyers if you insist on using the term &quot;Photoshopped&quot; I&#039;m sure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Olson, you&#8217;ll be hearing from Adobe&#8217;s lawyers if you insist on using the term &#8220;Photoshopped&#8221; I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Claudefm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/france-to-regulate-photoshopped-pics/comment-page-1/#comment-72144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claudefm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13902#comment-72144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The French ordeal of Doctors control the fake advertising especially in cosmetology when the companies use prepuber models to launch  antiobesity cream for example. The images expressed by the ad influence the way people want to look like. It is important to ban some photoshopped pics to keep realistic images as model for healthy lifestyle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French ordeal of Doctors control the fake advertising especially in cosmetology when the companies use prepuber models to launch  antiobesity cream for example. The images expressed by the ad influence the way people want to look like. It is important to ban some photoshopped pics to keep realistic images as model for healthy lifestyle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ras		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/france-to-regulate-photoshopped-pics/comment-page-1/#comment-72141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13902#comment-72141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will the French also regulate then, because it would be consistent to do so:

...  The use of cosmetics to improve one&#039;s appearance? 

... Diet and exercise (you can improve your appearance but not too much?)? 

... Cosmetic surgery? 

... Cartoon-characters&#039; figures? Barbie dolls?

... Camera angles (some are definitely more flattering than others) and clothes (ditto).

If we accept the logic for photoshop regulation, in what way would the above not also qualify for, nay require, the same treatment? For the children of course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the French also regulate then, because it would be consistent to do so:</p>
<p>&#8230;  The use of cosmetics to improve one&#8217;s appearance? </p>
<p>&#8230; Diet and exercise (you can improve your appearance but not too much?)? </p>
<p>&#8230; Cosmetic surgery? </p>
<p>&#8230; Cartoon-characters&#8217; figures? Barbie dolls?</p>
<p>&#8230; Camera angles (some are definitely more flattering than others) and clothes (ditto).</p>
<p>If we accept the logic for photoshop regulation, in what way would the above not also qualify for, nay require, the same treatment? For the children of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
