<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: National Journal blogger&#8217;s poll on med-mal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/national-journal-bloggers-poll-on-med-mal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/national-journal-bloggers-poll-on-med-mal/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Todd Rogers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/national-journal-bloggers-poll-on-med-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-71623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13601#comment-71623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OR, Obamacare could just include low-cost (dare I say subsidized) travel vouchers to places such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_tourism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Bumrungrad &lt;/a&gt; as an &quot;option&quot; to the public,  provided the patient pays  &quot;OOP&quot; and signs a waiver.  There might, however, be some powerful interests who oppose this idea, and will argue to the death that it doesn&#039;t offer negatively impacted patients sufficient remedy.  Go figure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OR, Obamacare could just include low-cost (dare I say subsidized) travel vouchers to places such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_tourism" rel="nofollow"> Bumrungrad </a> as an &#8220;option&#8221; to the public,  provided the patient pays  &#8220;OOP&#8221; and signs a waiver.  There might, however, be some powerful interests who oppose this idea, and will argue to the death that it doesn&#8217;t offer negatively impacted patients sufficient remedy.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/national-journal-bloggers-poll-on-med-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-71621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13601#comment-71621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;National Journal blogger&#039;s poll on med-mal...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some interestingly cross-cutting results, summarized by National Journal as &quot;Would Tort Reform Make Pill Easier To Swallow? Right-Leaning Bloggers Say They&#039;d Support A Health Care Bill That Included It; Some Left-Leaners Would Hold Their Nose For It....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National Journal blogger&#8217;s poll on med-mal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some interestingly cross-cutting results, summarized by National Journal as &#8220;Would Tort Reform Make Pill Easier To Swallow? Right-Leaning Bloggers Say They&#8217;d Support A Health Care Bill That Included It; Some Left-Leaners Would Hold Their Nose For It&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
