Comments on: Man’s “defective underwear” suit against Hanes

By: Benjamin

Benjamin — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:07:48 +0000

If something (especially that) hurts, you find out what is causing it and fix what is wrong. If it is in an inaccessible place, you will find a restroom immediately so you can look. At least a reasonable person would, which law is based on reasonable people.

By: B. RAD

B. RAD — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:17:03 +0000

Makes a man wanna go commando.

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:17:17 +0000

Here is the missing link.

http://funnyvideooftheday.blogspot.com/2006/04/seinfeld-shrinkage-episode.html

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:15:16 +0000

We all know that his claim is bogus due to the shrinkage factor.

By: A.W.

A.W. — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:24:40 +0000

Btw, i am surprised everyone missed that he won the trip by selling diet products!

By: A.W.

A.W. — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:18:33 +0000

Well given that the Plaintiff had to admit that he was too fat to see his, um, appendage, thank god he got alot of money from the court to compensate him for that embarrassment.

Oh wait, he lost.. oh, um, nevermind.

normally it is wrong to laugh at a man for being fat, but in this case, let’s all make an exception.

By: Tom T.

Tom T. — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:16:19 +0000

An opinion that will live forever as a testament to the exhibitionistic stupidity of some people.

What was up with footnote 3, in which a male attorney who just happened to be sitting in the courtroom was called upon to testify?