<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: December 7 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-7-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-7-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-7-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-80512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15042#comment-80512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So if a big company infringes on a smaller company&#039;s patent, the smaller company is a patent troll?  Since when did technology companies stop performing patent searches?

Yep, that seems fair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a big company infringes on a smaller company&#8217;s patent, the smaller company is a patent troll?  Since when did technology companies stop performing patent searches?</p>
<p>Yep, that seems fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-7-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-80391</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15042#comment-80391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have yet to see any evidence to convince me that even intentional camcording in movie theaters has any negative impact on the revenues of the movie companies. The quality is awful, much inferior to a DVD. As far as I can tell, the market for camcorder copies consists of hard-core fans who want to see the film as soon as possible, and these are the very people who will buy the DVD when it becomes available. That this is treated as a criminal offense at all makes no sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to see any evidence to convince me that even intentional camcording in movie theaters has any negative impact on the revenues of the movie companies. The quality is awful, much inferior to a DVD. As far as I can tell, the market for camcorder copies consists of hard-core fans who want to see the film as soon as possible, and these are the very people who will buy the DVD when it becomes available. That this is treated as a criminal offense at all makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Le Mur		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-7-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-80361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Mur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15042#comment-80361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;“camcordering”&lt;/I&gt;

Next step: The MPAA will pay congress to make it a felony to write or talk about a movie in an &quot;offensive&quot; manner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“camcordering”</i></p>
<p>Next step: The MPAA will pay congress to make it a felony to write or talk about a movie in an &#8220;offensive&#8221; manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
