<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A thought on Apple&#8217;s iPad	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Soronel Haetir		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-82560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soronel Haetir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15800#comment-82560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing I see WRT these devices, unlike digital music players, print publishers are not yet in the position of having their traditional market implode.  They just don&#039;t feel the squeeze of everyone stealing their product because electronic media simply is not the same.  And thus you have a discount for e-text, but not nearly what it needs to be for such devices to really take off and you have the TTS disabling when you do have e-text.  Newspapers and magazines on the other hand seem like they would be a much better niche to attempt getting people to convert, and possibly some specialty areas such as law.  But I just don&#039;t see traditional print being sunk any time soon, perhaps when a direct neural interface is invented.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I see WRT these devices, unlike digital music players, print publishers are not yet in the position of having their traditional market implode.  They just don&#8217;t feel the squeeze of everyone stealing their product because electronic media simply is not the same.  And thus you have a discount for e-text, but not nearly what it needs to be for such devices to really take off and you have the TTS disabling when you do have e-text.  Newspapers and magazines on the other hand seem like they would be a much better niche to attempt getting people to convert, and possibly some specialty areas such as law.  But I just don&#8217;t see traditional print being sunk any time soon, perhaps when a direct neural interface is invented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bumper		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-82542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15800#comment-82542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From the Apple iPad Tech Specs webpage:

Accessibility
    Support for playback of closed-captioned content
    VoiceOver screen reader
    Full-screen zoom magnification
    White on black display
    Mono audio

Very similar to OS X and appears to provide the features demanded of the Kindle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Apple iPad Tech Specs webpage:</p>
<p>Accessibility<br />
    Support for playback of closed-captioned content<br />
    VoiceOver screen reader<br />
    Full-screen zoom magnification<br />
    White on black display<br />
    Mono audio</p>
<p>Very similar to OS X and appears to provide the features demanded of the Kindle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carter		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-82536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15800#comment-82536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Free distribution through government agencies to the handicapped. Perhaps accomplished via congressional earmark.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free distribution through government agencies to the handicapped. Perhaps accomplished via congressional earmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bumper		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-82534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15800#comment-82534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I haven&#039;t made the switch to an iPhone, I do know that OS X already has a great deal of accessibility built in. Plus, as I have commented here before,  the Kindle&#039;s accessibility or lack thereof had little to do with Amazon getting sued. They were just a big convenient headline-getting target. Oh wait, Target has already been sued by these same groups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I haven&#8217;t made the switch to an iPhone, I do know that OS X already has a great deal of accessibility built in. Plus, as I have commented here before,  the Kindle&#8217;s accessibility or lack thereof had little to do with Amazon getting sued. They were just a big convenient headline-getting target. Oh wait, Target has already been sued by these same groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A.W.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/a-thought-on-apples-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-82531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15800#comment-82531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i figure that among the thousands of apps in the iphone, there is one to make it accessible.  and supposedly all apps in the iphone work in the ipad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i figure that among the thousands of apps in the iphone, there is one to make it accessible.  and supposedly all apps in the iphone work in the ipad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
