<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 22 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-22-roundup-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-22-roundup-3/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-22-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-82376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15712#comment-82376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do multinational corporations now have the same rights that I do? Or even essentially foreign corporations - they can always claim a stake in the US. Does China have equal speech rights because they own our debt?
From a different point of view, if I start a corporation do I get two voices? Or is that only if I&#039;m a ventriloquist. Or how about two distinct opinions? Can I only have two distinct opinions if I&#039;m a ... never mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do multinational corporations now have the same rights that I do? Or even essentially foreign corporations &#8211; they can always claim a stake in the US. Does China have equal speech rights because they own our debt?<br />
From a different point of view, if I start a corporation do I get two voices? Or is that only if I&#8217;m a ventriloquist. Or how about two distinct opinions? Can I only have two distinct opinions if I&#8217;m a &#8230; never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-22-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-82280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15712#comment-82280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It sounds like there are multiple grounds for disbarring Andrew Thomas, an approach that has the virtue that the process can be handled outside of his jurisdiction, preventing him or Arpaio from using their positions to retaliate. For instance, Arizona Ethics Rule 8.2 (a) states that:
&quot;A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.&quot; Several of his attacks on judges would seem to be good candidates for violations of this rule.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like there are multiple grounds for disbarring Andrew Thomas, an approach that has the virtue that the process can be handled outside of his jurisdiction, preventing him or Arpaio from using their positions to retaliate. For instance, Arizona Ethics Rule 8.2 (a) states that:<br />
&#8220;A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.&#8221; Several of his attacks on judges would seem to be good candidates for violations of this rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
