<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 30 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GregS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-82803</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15835#comment-82803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Citizens United: Fascinating to see how the Democrats are now explicitly opposed to the first amendment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Citizens United: Fascinating to see how the Democrats are now explicitly opposed to the first amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-82733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15835#comment-82733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;While past lending discrimination cases primarily focused on “redlining” — a bank’s refusal to lend to qualified borrowers in minority areas — the new push will instead center on a more recent phenomenon critics have called “reverse redlining.”&lt;/i&gt;

Damned if you don’t and damned if you do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>While past lending discrimination cases primarily focused on “redlining” — a bank’s refusal to lend to qualified borrowers in minority areas — the new push will instead center on a more recent phenomenon critics have called “reverse redlining.”</i></p>
<p>Damned if you don’t and damned if you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Reuven		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-82672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15835#comment-82672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was hoping that the Proposition 8 trial would be televised, as that option piece you cited concurred. It would have thrown a spotlight over the less-than-honest tactics (related to using tax-exempt Churches for political lobbying) and the thin arguments. Without televised trials the usefulness of this challenge (which has a slim chance of winning, especially with anti-SSM Barack H. Obama in charge) is questionable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping that the Proposition 8 trial would be televised, as that option piece you cited concurred. It would have thrown a spotlight over the less-than-honest tactics (related to using tax-exempt Churches for political lobbying) and the thin arguments. Without televised trials the usefulness of this challenge (which has a slim chance of winning, especially with anti-SSM Barack H. Obama in charge) is questionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-82633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15835#comment-82633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Legal Satyricon is funny.  Grading comments on reading comprehension is very entertaining.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal Satyricon is funny.  Grading comments on reading comprehension is very entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
