<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lowering the Bar &#8220;Best of 2009&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Melvin H.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-82251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melvin H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15696#comment-82251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds like the 1974 (1972?) ballot initiative in Colorado, on whether to have the &#039;76 Winter Olympics in Denver:  One of the local newspeople here, describing what the issue meant, said that (paraphrasing) &quot;a &#039;no&#039; vote on the issue means you support the Games here; a &#039;yes&#039; vote means you want the Games out of here.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the 1974 (1972?) ballot initiative in Colorado, on whether to have the &#8217;76 Winter Olympics in Denver:  One of the local newspeople here, describing what the issue meant, said that (paraphrasing) &#8220;a &#8216;no&#8217; vote on the issue means you support the Games here; a &#8216;yes&#8217; vote means you want the Games out of here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Depends on Your Definition of the Word Yes &#124; The Agitator		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-82234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Depends on Your Definition of the Word Yes &#124; The Agitator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15696#comment-82234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] (Via Walter Olson.)    Digg it&#160;&#124;&#160; reddit&#160;&#124;&#160; del.icio.us&#160;&#124;&#160; Fark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Via Walter Olson.)    Digg it&nbsp;|&nbsp; reddit&nbsp;|&nbsp; del.icio.us&nbsp;|&nbsp; Fark [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heads We Win, Tails You Lose - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-82233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heads We Win, Tails You Lose - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15696#comment-82233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] (Via Walter Olson.) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Via Walter Olson.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/01/lowering-the-bar-best-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-82228</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15696#comment-82228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not quite the same thing, but I recently discovered that as opposed to the generally held principle that unless otherwise defined words have their ordinary meaning, the rule of law in NJ  is that &quot;and&quot; and &quot;or&quot; may be interpreted interchangeably.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite the same thing, but I recently discovered that as opposed to the generally held principle that unless otherwise defined words have their ordinary meaning, the rule of law in NJ  is that &#8220;and&#8221; and &#8220;or&#8221; may be interpreted interchangeably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
