Comments on: State of the Union: Lip-reading Justice Alito

By: Why Supreme Court Justice May Have Been So Annoyed at the President’s State of the Union Address | OpenMarket.org

Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:50:39 +0000

[…] response, an annoyed Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who was attending the speech as an invited guest, apparently mouthed the words “not true,” […]

By: Melvin H.

Melvin H. — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:15:26 +0000

Besmirch must be somehow related to Rosie O’Donnell; she did the same thing to her guest on her own show regarding his stand on gun control–Tom Selleck, who was there to publicize a movie, and who had laryngitis. Approve of THAT , besmirch?

By: John David Galt

John David Galt — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:49:50 +0000

I would think that FDR’s threat to “pack” the Supreme Court is entirely comparable. And the decisions he bullied them into making still need to be undone if we are ever to return to our Constitutional form of government.

By: L. C. Burgundy

L. C. Burgundy — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:04:42 +0000

I do believe that Besmirch has just violated Godwin’s law.
—

And in a non sequitir fashion too, to boot. I was not expecting Godwinization based on my reply.

—
As opposed to your act, No Name Guy, where you vote for a coke snorting army deserter twice. Enjoy your nucular winter.
—-

Come back besmirch! Come back! It’s 2010! We live in the time of hope and CHANGE. All trolls will be made whole – promise.

By: besmirch

besmirch — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:28:00 +0000

As opposed to your act, No Name Guy, where you vote for a coke snorting army deserter twice. Enjoy your nucular winter.

By: JW

JW — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:54:23 +0000

So Joe Wilson violates the rules of decorum and comes under fire, but Obama violates the rules of decorum and gets a warm reception from the same groups that were so worried about decorum? I wonder what people who engage in such a double standard are called.

By: No Name Guy

No Name Guy — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:36:13 +0000

That’s a class act there ‘smirch. You apparently can’t argue facts, so you resort to smears, which is par for the course from some folks.

In any event, it was pretty tacky on the part of the President.

So, one has to wonder what he was thinking. Let’s see – the SC just said that Congress does NOT have the right to make a law abridging speech. And The Chosen One want’s the Congress to make a law to……..abridge speech. Hmmm….. yeah, that’ll fly.

What’s sad about this decision is that, besides the Congress that passed it, and the former President that signed it, there are 4 current Supreme Court Justices that are functionally illiterate in that they fail to comprehend the simple phrase of English in the 1st that says “Congress shall make no law” period, with no exceptions.

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:19:34 +0000

I do believe that Besmirch has just violated Godwin’s law.

By: Pete Madsen

Pete Madsen — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:16:40 +0000

This is interesting in that Obama himself illegally accepted contributions from foreigners for his presidential campaign.

By: Besmirch

Besmirch — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:05:38 +0000

Sieg heil, LC