<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Now in paperback: Philip K. Howard&#8217;s &#8220;Life Without Lawyers, Restoring Responsibility in America&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/02/now-in-paperback-philip-k-howards-life-without-lawyers-restoring-responsibility-in-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/02/now-in-paperback-philip-k-howards-life-without-lawyers-restoring-responsibility-in-america/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/02/now-in-paperback-philip-k-howards-life-without-lawyers-restoring-responsibility-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-83433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16004#comment-83433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a thoughtful book with some nice ideas.  The problem is that Howard is writing under the assumption that we live in a Norman Rockwell society that can simply take note of the nuttiness, gather itself up and correct course.  But we don&#039;t.  We live in James Howard Kunstler&#039;s Bowling Alone society -- jam-packed, fractured, multi-this and multi-that.  People today have tattoos on their necks.  They do not say &quot;yes ma&#039;am&quot; and &quot;no ma&#039;am.&quot;  This is precisely the social dump to which lawyers flock -- the angrier and more confused it is, the more business they get.  Unless that changes, Howard&#039;s lament is useless.  He might try focusing instead on the root causes of this societal decline, but there are very few politically correct or watercooler-comfortable conclusions to be had there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a thoughtful book with some nice ideas.  The problem is that Howard is writing under the assumption that we live in a Norman Rockwell society that can simply take note of the nuttiness, gather itself up and correct course.  But we don&#8217;t.  We live in James Howard Kunstler&#8217;s Bowling Alone society &#8212; jam-packed, fractured, multi-this and multi-that.  People today have tattoos on their necks.  They do not say &#8220;yes ma&#8217;am&#8221; and &#8220;no ma&#8217;am.&#8221;  This is precisely the social dump to which lawyers flock &#8212; the angrier and more confused it is, the more business they get.  Unless that changes, Howard&#8217;s lament is useless.  He might try focusing instead on the root causes of this societal decline, but there are very few politically correct or watercooler-comfortable conclusions to be had there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: February 10 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/02/now-in-paperback-philip-k-howards-life-without-lawyers-restoring-responsibility-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-83365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[February 10 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16004#comment-83365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Our litigation process encourages radical polarization&#8221; &#8212; part II of Q&#038;A with author Philip Howard [WSJ Law Blog, link to part I] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Our litigation process encourages radical polarization&#8221; &#8212; part II of Q&amp;A with author Philip Howard [WSJ Law Blog, link to part I] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
