<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Attorney&#8217;s fee spin cycle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/attorneys-fee-spin-cycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/attorneys-fee-spin-cycle/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: AMcA		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/attorneys-fee-spin-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-86242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AMcA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16592#comment-86242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Posner?  Caustic?

Never.  Not even possible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posner?  Caustic?</p>
<p>Never.  Not even possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Burgess		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/attorneys-fee-spin-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-86057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16592#comment-86057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems that being completely nuts is not something for which one can be disbarred. That&#039;s useful to know, both for protection and to open new, post-retirement job opportunities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that being completely nuts is not something for which one can be disbarred. That&#8217;s useful to know, both for protection and to open new, post-retirement job opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/attorneys-fee-spin-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-86048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16592#comment-86048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For those too lazy too read the entire article, it concludes with the statement that the lawyers spent just shy of a quarter million dollars and that:

&#039;He said he would petition to the appeals court for a rehearing.&#039;  

Thereby, no doubt, increasing the legal bill.   For a suit in which he hopes to recover $17,000  and which the judge  estimates as worth no more than $3000.

I can think of no sarcastic remark worthy of this.

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those too lazy too read the entire article, it concludes with the statement that the lawyers spent just shy of a quarter million dollars and that:</p>
<p>&#8216;He said he would petition to the appeals court for a rehearing.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Thereby, no doubt, increasing the legal bill.   For a suit in which he hopes to recover $17,000  and which the judge  estimates as worth no more than $3000.</p>
<p>I can think of no sarcastic remark worthy of this.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
