<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Federal anti-SLAPP legislation proposed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/federal-anti-slapp-legislation-proposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/federal-anti-slapp-legislation-proposed/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SLAPP bill: advancing free speech at federalism&#8217;s expense?		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/federal-anti-slapp-legislation-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-85349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SLAPP bill: advancing free speech at federalism&#8217;s expense?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16373#comment-85349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Ken at Popehat: &#8220;Let’s get this straight from the start: I’m in favor of anti-SLAPP statutes and vigorous legal protections for free speech. I’m just not convinced that federalizing libel law is the right way to go about it.&#8221; Earlier on the Cohen bill here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ken at Popehat: &#8220;Let’s get this straight from the start: I’m in favor of anti-SLAPP statutes and vigorous legal protections for free speech. I’m just not convinced that federalizing libel law is the right way to go about it.&#8221; Earlier on the Cohen bill here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Litigation and Trial - Max Kennerly		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/federal-anti-slapp-legislation-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-85019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Litigation and Trial - Max Kennerly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16373#comment-85019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Problem With HR 4364, The Proposed Federal Anti-SLAPP Law...&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Overlawyered, Eric Goldman and others favor HR 4364, the &#8220;Citizen Participation Act of 2009,&#8221; which would establish a federal anti-SLAPP law. Around half the States have anti-SLAPP (i.e., Anti-&#034;Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Part...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Problem With HR 4364, The Proposed Federal Anti-SLAPP Law&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Via Overlawyered, Eric Goldman and others favor HR 4364, the &ldquo;Citizen Participation Act of 2009,&rdquo; which would establish a federal anti-SLAPP law. Around half the States have anti-SLAPP (i.e., Anti-&quot;Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
