<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: March 19 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: April 6 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-87151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April 6 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16551#comment-87151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Wi-fi, junk science, loser-pays and lawsuit lunacy [Popehat, Chicago Tribune, earlier here and here] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wi-fi, junk science, loser-pays and lawsuit lunacy [Popehat, Chicago Tribune, earlier here and here] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-85988</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16551#comment-85988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For why I believe junk fax litigation has led to some highly unjust results -- which is different from saying &quot;junk faxing is OK&quot; which is not what I said or would say -- see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_wsj-rumpelstiltskin_llp.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2006 article&lt;/a&gt; linked above.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For why I believe junk fax litigation has led to some highly unjust results &#8212; which is different from saying &#8220;junk faxing is OK&#8221; which is not what I said or would say &#8212; see the <a href="http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_wsj-rumpelstiltskin_llp.htm" rel="nofollow">2006 article</a> linked above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-85980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16551#comment-85980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering--why do you think Junk Faxing is OK? 

Suing Junk Faxers is very different from suing small buisnesses that print 5 digits instead of 4 on CC receipts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering&#8211;why do you think Junk Faxing is OK? </p>
<p>Suing Junk Faxers is very different from suing small buisnesses that print 5 digits instead of 4 on CC receipts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/03/march-19-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-85915</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16551#comment-85915</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On a personal note, my power is finally back on, so a normal blogging pace can resume.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a personal note, my power is finally back on, so a normal blogging pace can resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
