Comments on: April 22 roundup https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/april-22-roundup/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:29:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: thenambypamby https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/april-22-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-88679 Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:57:14 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17052#comment-88679 You guys are making me blush. Stop it.

Ok. Kidding, you can keep doing it.

(Thanks for the link!)

]]> By: William Nuesslein https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/april-22-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-88599 Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:46:20 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17052#comment-88599 I understand that Toyota’s $16 million dollar payment was rational if it dampens adverse publicity. But the payment will be viewed by many as vindication for the hysteria generated by the Naderites. I would be interested in Ted Frank’s or Walter Olson’s take on the matter.

]]> By: Peter https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/april-22-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-88578 Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:00:33 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17052#comment-88578 Member of the public, having bought stolen goods, demanding money for its return – guilty
Lawyer, having bought stolen goods, demanding money for its return – not guilty (or at least ‘not proven’)

I do like the bit at the end where the article mensions one of Lawyers facing being struck off for using clients money to buy the painting.

]]> By: Doug https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/april-22-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-88541 Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:26:55 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17052#comment-88541 You should link Namby Pamby. I have been reading the blog for about 3 months and find it to be very funny.

]]>