<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Class action suit over GameStop resales	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bryan C: If the package said the game included a collectible coin, would the manufacturer be responsible if GameStop sold a used game without one? It&#039;s the reseller&#039;s responsibility to make sure the product is labeled appropriately for resale. The manufacturer labels the product for original sale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan C: If the package said the game included a collectible coin, would the manufacturer be responsible if GameStop sold a used game without one? It&#8217;s the reseller&#8217;s responsibility to make sure the product is labeled appropriately for resale. The manufacturer labels the product for original sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bryan C		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GameStop isn&#039;t bricking the games or restricting downloadable content. Nor are they printing misleading information on the box. That&#039;s all being done by the game publishers who insist on crippling their games with anti-consumer DRM mechanisms. Go sue Electronic Arts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GameStop isn&#8217;t bricking the games or restricting downloadable content. Nor are they printing misleading information on the box. That&#8217;s all being done by the game publishers who insist on crippling their games with anti-consumer DRM mechanisms. Go sue Electronic Arts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rliyen		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rliyen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is why I opt out of any CA suits that come down the pike.  They only benefit the lawyers, not the aggrieved party.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I opt out of any CA suits that come down the pike.  They only benefit the lawyers, not the aggrieved party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My prediction is that the case will be settled with a large payment to the lawyers and rebate coupons for the class members.  The fix will be a warning sticker that states that not all content listed on the box may be available.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prediction is that the case will be settled with a large payment to the lawyers and rebate coupons for the class members.  The fix will be a warning sticker that states that not all content listed on the box may be available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Come to think of it, without a receipt or similar proof of purchase that would cause the store to accept the return, how can you demonstrate you are actually a member of the class?

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it, without a receipt or similar proof of purchase that would cause the store to accept the return, how can you demonstrate you are actually a member of the class?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, gitarcarver, there you go.  It doesn&#039;t have the whatsit, you bring it back with the receipt -- standard for stores to insist on receipts -- and if they ask why you say &quot;I can&#039;t access the internet downloads.&quot;  Not that you have to tell them, but management likes to know why merchandise is returned.

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, gitarcarver, there you go.  It doesn&#8217;t have the whatsit, you bring it back with the receipt &#8212; standard for stores to insist on receipts &#8212; and if they ask why you say &#8220;I can&#8217;t access the internet downloads.&#8221;  Not that you have to tell them, but management likes to know why merchandise is returned.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gitarcarver		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gitarcarver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Does Gamestop allow you to return the game?&lt;/i&gt;

According to the store return policy at:
http://www.gamestop.com/gs/help/Store%20Return%20Policy.pdf

&lt;i&gt;A receipt is required for all returns and exchanges.
• Unopened new merchandise may be returned for a refund or exchanged within 30 days of purchase.
• Opened new merchandise may be exchanged for the identical item within 30 days of purchase but, with the exception of opened new accessories, cannot be returned for a refund.
• Used (pre-owned) merchandise and opened new accessories may be returned for a refund within 7 days of purchase or exchanged for the identical item within 30 days of purchase.
• We reserve the right to refuse any return and to require that certain items be returned directly to the manufacturer.  &lt;/i&gt;

Other sites and comments have picked up on the same issue that you might be hinting at - &quot;why not just return the game?&quot;  As anyone who has played a video game knows, seven days is a long time to have a new game sitting there, beside your computer, whispering in your ear......
&quot;...install meeeeee... play meeeeeee.....&quot;   ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Does Gamestop allow you to return the game?</i></p>
<p>According to the store return policy at:<br />
<a href="http://www.gamestop.com/gs/help/Store%20Return%20Policy.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.gamestop.com/gs/help/Store%20Return%20Policy.pdf</a></p>
<p><i>A receipt is required for all returns and exchanges.<br />
• Unopened new merchandise may be returned for a refund or exchanged within 30 days of purchase.<br />
• Opened new merchandise may be exchanged for the identical item within 30 days of purchase but, with the exception of opened new accessories, cannot be returned for a refund.<br />
• Used (pre-owned) merchandise and opened new accessories may be returned for a refund within 7 days of purchase or exchanged for the identical item within 30 days of purchase.<br />
• We reserve the right to refuse any return and to require that certain items be returned directly to the manufacturer.  </i></p>
<p>Other sites and comments have picked up on the same issue that you might be hinting at &#8211; &#8220;why not just return the game?&#8221;  As anyone who has played a video game knows, seven days is a long time to have a new game sitting there, beside your computer, whispering in your ear&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&#8220;&#8230;install meeeeee&#8230; play meeeeeee&#8230;..&#8221;   😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Lipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does Gamestop allow you to return the game?

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Gamestop allow you to return the game?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Finkel		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Finkel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And this is exactly why re-selling a &lt;i&gt;product&lt;/i&gt; with DRM attached gets slippery. The new term is &lt;strong&gt;brick&lt;/strong&gt; as in what may happen when your iPhone dies if you perform unauthorized &#039;upgrades&#039;. As game companies try for stricter control over consoles and &lt;i&gt;physical&lt;/i&gt; games, there will be more issues. Clearly &quot;pay to play&quot; for ONLY initial purchasers will affect all subsequent resales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is exactly why re-selling a <i>product</i> with DRM attached gets slippery. The new term is <strong>brick</strong> as in what may happen when your iPhone dies if you perform unauthorized &#8216;upgrades&#8217;. As game companies try for stricter control over consoles and <i>physical</i> games, there will be more issues. Clearly &#8220;pay to play&#8221; for ONLY initial purchasers will affect all subsequent resales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Cuyle		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/class-action-suit-over-gamestop-resales/comment-page-1/#comment-87198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cuyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16813#comment-87198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m really torn on this one.  Day one/initial purchase DLC is essentially the best available workaround for not having a robust mechanism for tying an individual license to a user with console games.  If it weren&#039;t for the relatively large (but rapidly shrinking) number of users that don&#039;t have regular internet connections for their consoles, I think it would be appropriate to lock 50-75% of the game to a DLC purchase and include a token for a free copy in the box.  

On the one hand, I don&#039;t really believe a class action is particularly appropriate for this.  On the other hand, I&#039;m pretty keen on anything that negatively impacts Gamestop&#039;s used game trade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really torn on this one.  Day one/initial purchase DLC is essentially the best available workaround for not having a robust mechanism for tying an individual license to a user with console games.  If it weren&#8217;t for the relatively large (but rapidly shrinking) number of users that don&#8217;t have regular internet connections for their consoles, I think it would be appropriate to lock 50-75% of the game to a DLC purchase and include a token for a free copy in the box.  </p>
<p>On the one hand, I don&#8217;t really believe a class action is particularly appropriate for this.  On the other hand, I&#8217;m pretty keen on anything that negatively impacts Gamestop&#8217;s used game trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
