<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Criminal libel charge over academic book review, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/criminal-libel-charge-over-academic-book-review-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/criminal-libel-charge-over-academic-book-review-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/criminal-libel-charge-over-academic-book-review-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-89233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17123#comment-89233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I read the review, and, of course, its an opinion of the book.  I am unsure how this can be construed as false.  It does make me wonder about the capability of the author of the book in writing anything of a scholarly nature.  Perhaps she felt that the review would impact her ability to find work.  The review, I felt, had some constructive criticism if that it suggested better editing and doing more than reprinting ICC&#039;s statutes would improve it.  Good luck to the website&#039;s editor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the review, and, of course, its an opinion of the book.  I am unsure how this can be construed as false.  It does make me wonder about the capability of the author of the book in writing anything of a scholarly nature.  Perhaps she felt that the review would impact her ability to find work.  The review, I felt, had some constructive criticism if that it suggested better editing and doing more than reprinting ICC&#8217;s statutes would improve it.  Good luck to the website&#8217;s editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
