Comments on: Jerman v. Carlisle https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/jerman-v-carlisle/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:27:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: William Nuesslein https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/jerman-v-carlisle/comment-page-1/#comment-89448 Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:27:11 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17113#comment-89448 Should there be an incentive to clean up technical violations? I am thinking about the guy who had to fix the 1.5 inch violation in the height of his bathroom mirror.

]]> By: Allan https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/04/jerman-v-carlisle/comment-page-1/#comment-89127 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:54:00 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=17113#comment-89127 I dissent from the dissent.

Congress intended that there be a remedy. Without a remedy, there is no way to enforce the law and there is no incentive for technical violators to clean up their violations.

I would suggest, in this case, your beef is with the legislature, not the courts, the plaintiffs, or the plaintiffs’ counsel.

]]>