Comments on: Subway descends

By: OldNaugaHerder

OldNaugaHerder — Fri, 21 May 2010 13:02:34 +0000

I thought a hot dog WAS a sandwich. I guess I’m wrong again.

By: Ace of Sevens

Ace of Sevens — Wed, 19 May 2010 23:17:10 +0000

They already retracted. they’re only concerned with sandwiches.

By: Todd Rogers

Todd Rogers — Wed, 19 May 2010 19:43:22 +0000

In a couple of days the drive-by-media will chime in on this. Subway will suddenly realize some dip-s**t in their legal department reached too far, and they will issue a retraction saying it was done in error.

By: wfjag

wfjag — Wed, 19 May 2010 17:11:17 +0000

Can hardly wait for Subway to take on the Porn Industry.

By: Heather

Heather — Wed, 19 May 2010 13:03:41 +0000

What if I call it a “foot-long”?

FTA: which has been selling 12-inch hot dogs that it dares to calls “footlongs” for more than 40 years.

Unbelievable. No one goes to Subway when they want a hot dog.

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Wed, 19 May 2010 12:27:04 +0000

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-279169.html

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Wed, 19 May 2010 12:24:49 +0000

The trademark office will have to weigh that argument against the notion that "footlong" is commonly used to describe sandwiches that are 12 inches long, and not the property of one company. Ya think! And I thought this was going to be a post about a class action lawsuit against Subway because someone measured the sandwich and found it to be only 11 ¾ inches long. I know I am just being silly. Nobody would ever file such a ridiculous lawsuit. I don’t have time to write anymore about this now. I am going to lunch at Subways. Anyone see my ruler?