Comments on: “Yet Another Lawsuit About the Lack of Fruit in ‘Froot Loops'”

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Mon, 31 May 2010 12:30:50 +0000

My apologies to the majority here for the spelling errors. As Lawyer apparently cannot read, no apology is extended to him.

Bob

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Mon, 31 May 2010 12:28:28 +0000

Well, you might learn to read and practice the skill. Then you might notice what the list of ingredients on boxes are. This could help prevent you from buying and consuming things that you don’t wish to.

Or you could could simply label anyone who disagrees with you a ‘corporate idolizer’. When what you probably mean is ‘corporation idolizer’. But as the distinction would mean you were capabble of reading a dictionary, your vituperation is noted.

Bob

By: Lawyer

Lawyer — Mon, 31 May 2010 07:11:14 +0000

Seriously,
What about the Pop Tarts which are not made of fruit?

Should a company market its product touting ingredients which dont exist?

Why can this company list the content of the product as real fruit, when in fact it is not?

Next time I buy a sandwich at Chick-fil-A that is labeled as an all white meat chicken filet, should I care if the meat turns out to instead be flavored soy protein?

Hoping the corporate idolizers on this site dont want us to go that far in excusing business fraud.

By: NL

NL — Sat, 08 May 2010 23:29:04 +0000

ROFL

By: Deputyheadmistress

Deputyheadmistress — Thu, 06 May 2010 18:45:16 +0000

Ah, Muddypaws, there’s a sad tale. The Marsh Mallow is an actual plant that was once, seriously, used to make the French confection which is the basis for marshmallows. Once upon a time housewives made marshmallows from scratch at home using parts of the marsh mallow plant. The mallow-free store boughten confection is named for the plant that was once but is no more the basiss for marshmallows.
Perhaps somebody should sue.

By: Marty

Marty — Wed, 05 May 2010 01:00:57 +0000

Grape Nuts are still legit though right?

By: Muddypaws

Muddypaws — Tue, 04 May 2010 06:05:08 +0000

Honestly! A suit over Fruit Loops?

How about going after confectioners who make Marshmallows? I’m sure there’s no MARSH ingredients in those things 😉

By: No Name Guy

No Name Guy — Tue, 04 May 2010 03:55:17 +0000

Barney – you have a second cause of action on those Pop Tarts. The didn’t use pop in them either. No coke, Pepsi, sprite, Dr pepper or any other soda (aka pop in certain parts of the country.). Sue em back into the stone age!

By: roy

roy — Tue, 04 May 2010 00:17:43 +0000

I went to Pizza Hut and was disappointed that the building was not an actual hut.

To be fair, that’s not actually pizza either, so it evens out.

By: OldNaugaHerder

OldNaugaHerder — Mon, 03 May 2010 20:04:17 +0000

I worked at Uniroyal (actual maker of Naugahyde) in South Bend Indiana in the late ’60s and they sold small stuffed toys covered with Naugahyde, calling them Naugas. I still have two of them, so don’t tell me “no Naugas are used in the production of Naugahyde”. I’ve got proof! :).