<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: June 10 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-10-roundup-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-10-roundup-3/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-10-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-92125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17725#comment-92125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Without suggesting that maimed soldiers don&#039;t deserve substantial compensation, the case of the lesbian soldier awarded £186,896 for sexual harassment may not be as egregious as it sounds. A subsantial part of that award consisted of punitive damages, which are not a component of compensation for war-related injuries. Perhaps punitive damages should go to someone other than the victim, in the way of a fine, but the purpose is to punish the tortfeasor.  I suspect, though I do not know the details, that badly injured soldiers receive compensation other than the awards mentioned, which is not factored into the comparison here, such as free medical care and a pension.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without suggesting that maimed soldiers don&#8217;t deserve substantial compensation, the case of the lesbian soldier awarded £186,896 for sexual harassment may not be as egregious as it sounds. A subsantial part of that award consisted of punitive damages, which are not a component of compensation for war-related injuries. Perhaps punitive damages should go to someone other than the victim, in the way of a fine, but the purpose is to punish the tortfeasor.  I suspect, though I do not know the details, that badly injured soldiers receive compensation other than the awards mentioned, which is not factored into the comparison here, such as free medical care and a pension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
