<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: June 24 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: &#8220;Patent marking&#8221; lawsuit craze		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-94871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Patent marking&#8221; lawsuit craze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17937#comment-94871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] it&#8217;s caught up with Apple. Earlier here, here, here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] it&#8217;s caught up with Apple. Earlier here, here, here, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Who got the lowest settlement from Expedia class action?		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-94042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who got the lowest settlement from Expedia class action?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17937#comment-94042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] It&#8217;s a contest! [California Civil Justice Blog, earlier] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s a contest! [California Civil Justice Blog, earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick Jette		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-93012</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Jette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17937#comment-93012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After reading about the regulation of salt content and the purported &quot;saving 150,000 lives per year&quot;, I was wondering. If these people do not die of salt related illnesses, what are they going to die of? Does the CSPI want us to believe that if we accept all of thier recommendations we will be immortal? 

Perhaps they want us to think our quality of life will be better because we are healthier later in life. I&#039;d like the option of making my own choice between being able to walk the golf course at 90 years old vs. a lifetime of really bland tasting food.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading about the regulation of salt content and the purported &#8220;saving 150,000 lives per year&#8221;, I was wondering. If these people do not die of salt related illnesses, what are they going to die of? Does the CSPI want us to believe that if we accept all of thier recommendations we will be immortal? </p>
<p>Perhaps they want us to think our quality of life will be better because we are healthier later in life. I&#8217;d like the option of making my own choice between being able to walk the golf course at 90 years old vs. a lifetime of really bland tasting food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-92997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17937#comment-92997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Kagan on tort reform...&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;ve previously written about Kagan&#039;s role in the Clinton administration opposing product liability reform, an act that helped bankrupt two of the Big Three auto companies a decade later. Now we learn from the New York Times that Kagan all......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kagan on tort reform&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve previously written about Kagan&#8217;s role in the Clinton administration opposing product liability reform, an act that helped bankrupt two of the Big Three auto companies a decade later. Now we learn from the New York Times that Kagan all&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-24-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-92996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17937#comment-92996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“NYC Naked Cowboy to Naked Cowgirl: Stop copying me”

Getting naked is now intellectual property?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“NYC Naked Cowboy to Naked Cowgirl: Stop copying me”</p>
<p>Getting naked is now intellectual property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
