<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Alabama law: contracts based on gambling are void	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/alabama-law-contracts-based-on-gambling-are-void/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/alabama-law-contracts-based-on-gambling-are-void/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:18:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: L Nettles		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/alabama-law-contracts-based-on-gambling-are-void/comment-page-1/#comment-95950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L Nettles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18541#comment-95950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Robert RORRER, Respondent,
v.
P.J. CLUB, INC., d/b/a Jamaica Joe&#039;s, Appellant.
No. 3409.
Submitted Sept. 4, 2001.
Decided Nov. 19, 2001.

Spouse of gambler brought action against owner of video poker games seeking to recover wife&#039;s excessive gambling losses. The Circuit Court, Horry County, Alison Renee Lee, J., entered judgment on $21,320 jury verdict for spouse, and trebled damages award pursuant to statute. Owner of games appealed. The Court of Appeals, Howard, J., held that: (1) rules of statutory construction, which required strict construction of penal statutes, did not increase burden of proof for recovery under statutes allowing recovery of excessive gambling losses; (2) treble damage award under statutes allowing recovery of excessive gambling losses was not punitive damages, and thus spouse of gambler only had to prove losses by preponderance of evidence standard; and (3) question of whether gambler sustained excessive losses playing video poker games was for jury.


Affirmed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeals of South Carolina.<br />
Robert RORRER, Respondent,<br />
v.<br />
P.J. CLUB, INC., d/b/a Jamaica Joe&#8217;s, Appellant.<br />
No. 3409.<br />
Submitted Sept. 4, 2001.<br />
Decided Nov. 19, 2001.</p>
<p>Spouse of gambler brought action against owner of video poker games seeking to recover wife&#8217;s excessive gambling losses. The Circuit Court, Horry County, Alison Renee Lee, J., entered judgment on $21,320 jury verdict for spouse, and trebled damages award pursuant to statute. Owner of games appealed. The Court of Appeals, Howard, J., held that: (1) rules of statutory construction, which required strict construction of penal statutes, did not increase burden of proof for recovery under statutes allowing recovery of excessive gambling losses; (2) treble damage award under statutes allowing recovery of excessive gambling losses was not punitive damages, and thus spouse of gambler only had to prove losses by preponderance of evidence standard; and (3) question of whether gambler sustained excessive losses playing video poker games was for jury.</p>
<p>Affirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
