Comments on: “Apple Sued Because iPad Does Not Work ‘Just Like A Book’ As Claimed”

By: kimsch

kimsch — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:49:28 +0000

@John – It’s pretty thin for a doorstop.

Melvin H. — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:45:54 +0000

No problem Jonathan; hadn’t quite thought of that one! 🙂

Jonathan Bailey — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:46:20 +0000

Um, That was addressed to your comment, Mel

Jonathan Bailey — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:45:49 +0000

They're probably going after the lower hanging froot first. (runs for cover)

John Burgess — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:07:13 +0000

It doesn’t function as a book-cum-bug-squasher, either. At least, not more than once. I’ve yet to determine its quality as book-cum-doorstop.

L. Hutz — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:17:36 +0000

This is the most blatant case of fraudulent advertising since my suit against the film, “The Never-Ending Story”.

Melvin H. — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:58:53 +0000

Surprising Apple hasn’t been sued because someone couldn’t find any apples in the computer……