<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 28 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-28-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-28-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-28-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-96250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18573#comment-96250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I nominate Derbyshire as the winner of the Sherrod commentary.  I personally felt gratification that, in the early stages of the story, someone was getting SOME justice for reverse discrimination.  I had to concede that the entire speech did change the meaning, but couldn&#039;t help but suspect that a white person in the same situation would not have gotten the benefit of 1) a broader context and 2) all divisions of the media coming to her rescue.

Derbyshire offers a nice reason for wishing she would have stayed fired:

&quot;So: while you&#039;re forming opinions on whether Andrew Breitbart did due diligence, whether the NAACP shot themselves in the foot, whether the White House ordered Ms. Sherrod&#039;s firing, whether Bill O&#039;Reilly committed journalistic malfeasance, and the other issues in the case, please don&#039;t lose sight of this key fact: Positions at all levels in the federal bureaucracy — positions dispensing power, patronage, and huge sums of public money — are being filled by radical revolutionary leftists like Shirley Sherrod.&quot;

That is a terrible and dismaying thing. Regardless of the nuances of this case, I hope Ms. Sherrod stays fired. I hope she never again controls the disbursement of public money or patronage power over public-sector jobs. People with her views, background, and connections should not be employed by the federal government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nominate Derbyshire as the winner of the Sherrod commentary.  I personally felt gratification that, in the early stages of the story, someone was getting SOME justice for reverse discrimination.  I had to concede that the entire speech did change the meaning, but couldn&#8217;t help but suspect that a white person in the same situation would not have gotten the benefit of 1) a broader context and 2) all divisions of the media coming to her rescue.</p>
<p>Derbyshire offers a nice reason for wishing she would have stayed fired:</p>
<p>&#8220;So: while you&#8217;re forming opinions on whether Andrew Breitbart did due diligence, whether the NAACP shot themselves in the foot, whether the White House ordered Ms. Sherrod&#8217;s firing, whether Bill O&#8217;Reilly committed journalistic malfeasance, and the other issues in the case, please don&#8217;t lose sight of this key fact: Positions at all levels in the federal bureaucracy — positions dispensing power, patronage, and huge sums of public money — are being filled by radical revolutionary leftists like Shirley Sherrod.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is a terrible and dismaying thing. Regardless of the nuances of this case, I hope Ms. Sherrod stays fired. I hope she never again controls the disbursement of public money or patronage power over public-sector jobs. People with her views, background, and connections should not be employed by the federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
