<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 30 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-30-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-30-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron Worthing		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-30-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-96543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Worthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18655#comment-96543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another link post that you guys can feel free to delete after you check out the link.

Drunk driver sues bar for selling him alcohol.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202463775081]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another link post that you guys can feel free to delete after you check out the link.</p>
<p>Drunk driver sues bar for selling him alcohol.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202463775081" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202463775081</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: captnhal		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-30-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-96521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captnhal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18655#comment-96521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In regard to the snow removal article I read the following: &quot;The SJC said its rules take effect immediately and will also apply retroactively to pending lawsuits.&quot;
How is it legal to change the rules retroactively?  Doesn&#039;t this make defendants financially responsible based on rules that didn&#039;t exist at the time of the incident?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to the snow removal article I read the following: &#8220;The SJC said its rules take effect immediately and will also apply retroactively to pending lawsuits.&#8221;<br />
How is it legal to change the rules retroactively?  Doesn&#8217;t this make defendants financially responsible based on rules that didn&#8217;t exist at the time of the incident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
