<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 6 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-6-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-6-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Rohan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-6-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-93903</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Rohan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18075#comment-93903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The taxpayers of California (a state on the verge of bankruptcy, btw) will pay $20 million to the abducted woman and her children. Never mind the fact that for many years during her &quot;abduction&quot; she was free to walk away at any moment. The vote was nearly unanimous.

I have sympathy for her, and the police did make some mistakes, but unless you consider the state to be solely responsible for your welfare, this &quot;gift&quot; doesn&#039;t make any sense. It also means that neither her, nor her children, nor her children&#039;s children will ever need to work a day in their lives (same goes for their attorney). I don&#039;t see how this is &quot;healing&quot; anything.

 At the very least, I hope there are two caveats: 1) that some of the money will at least come from the estate of the couple that abducted her, and 2) if she makes any lucrative book/movie deals, she will pay the state back for the funds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The taxpayers of California (a state on the verge of bankruptcy, btw) will pay $20 million to the abducted woman and her children. Never mind the fact that for many years during her &#8220;abduction&#8221; she was free to walk away at any moment. The vote was nearly unanimous.</p>
<p>I have sympathy for her, and the police did make some mistakes, but unless you consider the state to be solely responsible for your welfare, this &#8220;gift&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make any sense. It also means that neither her, nor her children, nor her children&#8217;s children will ever need to work a day in their lives (same goes for their attorney). I don&#8217;t see how this is &#8220;healing&#8221; anything.</p>
<p> At the very least, I hope there are two caveats: 1) that some of the money will at least come from the estate of the couple that abducted her, and 2) if she makes any lucrative book/movie deals, she will pay the state back for the funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-6-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-93843</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18075#comment-93843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t say that I thought I couldn&#039;t get any angrier at the state of policing in this country, because I knew I could.

The Skenazy link is worth a Two Minutes&#039; Hate all on its own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t say that I thought I couldn&#8217;t get any angrier at the state of policing in this country, because I knew I could.</p>
<p>The Skenazy link is worth a Two Minutes&#8217; Hate all on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
