<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A reminder: anti-arbitration is anti-consumer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/a-reminder-anti-arbitration-is-anti-consumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/a-reminder-anti-arbitration-is-anti-consumer/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/a-reminder-anti-arbitration-is-anti-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-97845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18823#comment-97845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the consumer does not have the choice to pre-commit to not bringing an extortionate lawsuit, the vendor cannot provide the consumer the lower costs available for making that promise.

The trial lawyers and Public Citizen want to forbid honest consumers like me from making that choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the consumer does not have the choice to pre-commit to not bringing an extortionate lawsuit, the vendor cannot provide the consumer the lower costs available for making that promise.</p>
<p>The trial lawyers and Public Citizen want to forbid honest consumers like me from making that choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom T.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/a-reminder-anti-arbitration-is-anti-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-97844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18823#comment-97844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can a consumer still *opt* for arbitration?  The suit just strikes a provision making it mandatory, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a consumer still *opt* for arbitration?  The suit just strikes a provision making it mandatory, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
