Comments on: “Rastafarian sues over grooming policy”

By: L. Hutz

L. Hutz — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:45:59 +0000

If it were a Sikh, would that change the equation?

jkoerner — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:38:09 +0000

I would like a mover that does not look like he has bedbugs residing in the mess on top his head. I would not hire such a mover if i had the choice.

million — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:38:00 +0000

The EEOC would like to see Woodson awarded… a position with Lawrence Transportation as a loader—hair intact.

What if Lawrence has already filled the vacancy? Will the EEOC force Lawrence to fire the current employee?

Frank — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:50:10 +0000

I imagine the authorization comes from the grant of executive powers to the President.

I like “non-standard hairstyles could affect Lawrence’s ability to “provide the service expected by” these people”

What kind of services do you think customers expect that involves an employee’s hair?

Jack Wilson — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:28:05 +0000

What in the constitution authorizes something called the EEOC?

Shtetl G — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:44:41 +0000

Jacob Miller can sympathize with Woodson: