<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: U.K.: &#8220;School &#8216;no touch&#8217; rules to be scrapped&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/10/u-k-school-no-touch-rules-to-be-scrapped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/10/u-k-school-no-touch-rules-to-be-scrapped/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hans		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/10/u-k-school-no-touch-rules-to-be-scrapped/comment-page-1/#comment-103130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=19510#comment-103130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Britain has taken ten steps backward (the awful &quot;third party harassment&quot; and &quot;positive action&quot; provisions) coupled with one step forward (the useful repeal of &quot;no touch&quot; rules).

One more reason not to set up a small business and hire people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain has taken ten steps backward (the awful &#8220;third party harassment&#8221; and &#8220;positive action&#8221; provisions) coupled with one step forward (the useful repeal of &#8220;no touch&#8221; rules).</p>
<p>One more reason not to set up a small business and hire people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
