<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: DOTSec: Let&#8217;s disable cellphones in cars	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will we also make it a Federal law that you have to move over when someone&#039;s behind you regardless of your current speed?

How about a law making it a felony to stop at an on-ramp or merge at speeds less than 80% of the posted speed limit?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we also make it a Federal law that you have to move over when someone&#8217;s behind you regardless of your current speed?</p>
<p>How about a law making it a felony to stop at an on-ramp or merge at speeds less than 80% of the posted speed limit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The jurisdiction of the FCC is the first thing I thought of when I read this.  But, don&#039;t worry, the Dept of Transportation and the FCC will sue each over this with the taxpayers paying the bill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jurisdiction of the FCC is the first thing I thought of when I read this.  But, don&#8217;t worry, the Dept of Transportation and the FCC will sue each over this with the taxpayers paying the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Besides the obvious stupidity of doing this, it also violates the FCC rule that makes cell phone jammers illegal. That is why movie theaters have to ask you to turn off your cell phone. They are not allowed to jam the signal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the obvious stupidity of doing this, it also violates the FCC rule that makes cell phone jammers illegal. That is why movie theaters have to ask you to turn off your cell phone. They are not allowed to jam the signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: VMS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The structure of state vehicle and traffic law penalties (fines and points on the license) seems to be in proportion to the seriousness of the offense. DWI&#062; DWAI &#062; speeding &#062; etc., with illegal cell phone use on the bottom of the totum pole.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The structure of state vehicle and traffic law penalties (fines and points on the license) seems to be in proportion to the seriousness of the offense. DWI&gt; DWAI &gt; speeding &gt; etc., with illegal cell phone use on the bottom of the totum pole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Uno Hu		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uno Hu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Better yet, between mandated mileages standards that will jack prices and require thoroughly undesirable ride and peformance characteristics to meet, let them mandate cell phone inactivators in all new cars.  What in the world makes them think I&#039;ll trade in the comfortable, relatively peppy sedan I have now for one of their expensive econo-boxes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better yet, between mandated mileages standards that will jack prices and require thoroughly undesirable ride and peformance characteristics to meet, let them mandate cell phone inactivators in all new cars.  What in the world makes them think I&#8217;ll trade in the comfortable, relatively peppy sedan I have now for one of their expensive econo-boxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron Worthing		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Worthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[hot air has a thorough take down, but i don&#039;t recall them mentioning the need for emergency use.

one of their better points: how do they plan on keeping you from disabling or removing the device?

by forcing you to submit to inspections?  or just hoping you won&#039;t do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hot air has a thorough take down, but i don&#8217;t recall them mentioning the need for emergency use.</p>
<p>one of their better points: how do they plan on keeping you from disabling or removing the device?</p>
<p>by forcing you to submit to inspections?  or just hoping you won&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marco73		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marco73]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every time Ray LaHood opens his mouth, he reinforces the founding father&#039;s principles of limited government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time Ray LaHood opens his mouth, he reinforces the founding father&#8217;s principles of limited government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mannie		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mannie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s just disable Ray LaHood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s just disable Ray LaHood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[how will I report my runaway Toyota?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how will I report my runaway Toyota?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E Garland		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/11/dotsec-lets-disable-cellphones-in-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-108147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E Garland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20193#comment-108147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can only note that, based on the numbers I&#039;ve seen, more accidents are still directly attributed to alcohol/drug imparment or speeding than cellphones...

Hence, to prevent/diminish such accidents, all cars should be electronically governed to 55 mph or less, and require a blood sample to operate...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only note that, based on the numbers I&#8217;ve seen, more accidents are still directly attributed to alcohol/drug imparment or speeding than cellphones&#8230;</p>
<p>Hence, to prevent/diminish such accidents, all cars should be electronically governed to 55 mph or less, and require a blood sample to operate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
