By: Walter Olson

Walter Olson — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:21:25 +0000

Actually, I read that Guardian commenter as taking Rose to task for (inter alia) mentioning the Liebeck hot coffee case without reciting it in its fully approved Litigation Lobby version. Rose pleads in response that he would have recited that full version if not for lack of space.

By: gitarcarver

gitarcarver — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:45:48 +0000

In the Guardian’s comments, a reader takes Neil Rose to task for what you are noting.

Rose responds in a classic “I know what I said but what I said was not actually what I said.”

Comments on: Guardian advances litigation urban legends

By: Walter Olson

By: gitarcarver