Comments on: Annals of litigation science https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/annals-of-litigation-science/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:02:25 +0000 hourly 1 By: J.T. Wenting https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/annals-of-litigation-science/comment-page-1/#comment-113195 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:02:25 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=20956#comment-113195 “I look forward to the day when other scientific questions are answered by the courts (or legislatures) and not, as is the current quaint custom, by scientists. ”

Global Warming Climate Change Catastrophic Climate Disruption?

]]> By: GregS https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/annals-of-litigation-science/comment-page-1/#comment-113170 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:18:51 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=20956#comment-113170 I look forward to the day when other scientific questions are answered by the courts (or legislatures) and not, as is the current quaint custom, by scientists. I look forward to hearing how the Supreme Court rules on the Unified Field Theory or what Congress ultimately decides is the true nature of dark matter.

It’s like we’re returning to the days when (in 1897) the Indiana state legislature tried (unsuccessfully) to redefine “pi” to be exactly 3.

]]> By: mojo https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/annals-of-litigation-science/comment-page-1/#comment-113041 Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:50:51 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=20956#comment-113041 1+1=ELEVENTY-GAZILLION!

]]> By: Chris https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/annals-of-litigation-science/comment-page-1/#comment-113028 Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:04:33 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=20956#comment-113028 Well that makes sense because lawyers are so good at math and science.

]]>