<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 26 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-26-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-26-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bfs		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-26-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-114269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bfs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=21160#comment-114269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;Reason&quot; review of &quot;Last Call&quot; fails to emphasize the extent to which the 18th Amendment was added to the Constitution was because it was supported not only by country preachers who hated &quot;demon rum,&quot; but by Progressives who wanted to improve the proletariat by removing the social evils rooted in easy access to alcohol, although it makes one mention of them.  This was one of the things I found when I read the book that I found most revealing.  Without Progressive support, the amendment never would have passed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Reason&#8221; review of &#8220;Last Call&#8221; fails to emphasize the extent to which the 18th Amendment was added to the Constitution was because it was supported not only by country preachers who hated &#8220;demon rum,&#8221; but by Progressives who wanted to improve the proletariat by removing the social evils rooted in easy access to alcohol, although it makes one mention of them.  This was one of the things I found when I read the book that I found most revealing.  Without Progressive support, the amendment never would have passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mojo		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-26-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-114047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mojo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=21160#comment-114047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: ADA ramps

In all fairness, &quot;accessible&quot; and &quot;secure&quot; are concepts that don&#039;t play well together.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: ADA ramps</p>
<p>In all fairness, &#8220;accessible&#8221; and &#8220;secure&#8221; are concepts that don&#8217;t play well together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
