Comments on: “Lawsuit planned by family of teen who fell from airplane”

By: No Name Guy

No Name Guy — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:44:04 +0000

Snark on.
In reality, the parents should be suing the aircraft maker. After all, it’s foreseeable that someone might attempt to stow away in the wheel well. In fact, it’s happened numerous times (usually resulting in death by crushing, freezing or hypoxia). That the manufacturer didn’t take steps to provide a system to warn the pilots of a stowaway indicates gross neglect. After all, why can’t they install a sensor to detect a large, organic foreign object in the wheel well? It would only cost a dollar per plane. And further more, how come there aren’t heaters, oxygen masks, handles to hold on to and sufficient space in the wheel well to allow a stow away to safely reside there if the sensor fails. Just think of the children!!!!
Snark off.

By: Melvin H.

Melvin H. — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:42:49 +0000

How about criminal charges against the parents for child neglect?

By: Bill Poser

Bill Poser — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:32:10 +0000

Is trespass not a tort in NC? The airline probably has a countersuit.

By: Bob Neal

Bob Neal — Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:42:34 +0000

Problem for these potential plaintiffs is that Contributory Negligence remains the law in NC.

By: Nevins

Nevins — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:33:12 +0000

‘Had airport security been up to par, he would be alive and well with his family today.’
Given his stunning lack of judgment, it is equally probable that he would have found another way to remove himself from the gene pool.

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:25:11 +0000

Robert, any figures on North Carolina, Massachussetts and Federal regulations? Because given the actions, those are the only jurisdictions I see in the matter.

Bob

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:53:13 +0000

@Bob Lipton: InCalifornia, parental liability is limited to $25,000 (I found a chart here http://www.mwl-law.com/CM/Resources/PARENTAL%20RESPONSIBILITY%20CHART%20(00033309).pdf ) Laws restricting parental liability may make it impossible for the airline to counter sue.

By: Harry Lime

Harry Lime — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:51:58 +0000

It’s lawsuits like these that make me think the old system of pure contributory negligence is the way to go. What the hell do you think is going to happen when you hide in the wheel well of a commercial aircraft? Obviously the wheels are going to have to come back down. I wonder if this kid had just watched the movie Commando on TV, as I’m pretty sure Arnold does the same think in one scene. I know North Carolina has pure contributory negligence for product liability suits. See N.C.G.S. § 99B-4(3). I wonder if they have the same for failure to secure cases (I’m assuming this would just be a negligence claim).

By: PointOfLaw Forum

PointOfLaw Forum — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:03:37 +0000

Personal responsibility files: Delvonte Tisdale…

16-year-old Devonte Tisdale didn’t make a sound decision when he ran away from home and stowed away in the wheel well of a US Airways plane at the Charlotte airport. Tisdale died from either exposure or from falling from the……

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:00:34 +0000

I hope the airline countersues for insufficient supervision of their son, which had the result that the airline was put to enormous expense. Should be worth a few million.

Bob